Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
10
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
How Scientists Turned Junkyard Scrap Metal Into A Battery[2016/11/08]
-
Airline ban on Samsung Galaxy Note 7 widens as concern grows about fire risk[2016/10/17]
-
Should you fear your phone battery?[2016/10/13]
-
Nation's first statewide plastic-bag ban now in effect across California[2016/11/14]
-
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Replacement Still Problematic? Users Complain Over New Battery Issues[2016/09/26]
-
BLOG For want of a better battery: Bob McDonald[2016/10/15]
-
How to stop your smartphone battery from exploding[2016/09/30]
-
How can a battery catch fire?[2016/10/15]
-
Apple is working on iPhone batteries that last longer and don’t explode[2016/10/08]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]
-
St. Jude Warns Defibrillator Patients About Battery Risks[2016/10/12]
-
The cost of plastic packaging[2016/10/18]
-
With Samsung's Note7 Crisis in Full Bloom, a New Patent Filing Reveals Samsung Rethinking Removable Batteries[2016/10/11]